Monday, 3 November 2014

Phonological Development

Phonological development (or phonemic development) is the gradual development of an ‘organised’, adult-like system of sound contrasts. Phonological development is thought to have three aspects which include the way the sound is stored in the child’s mind, the way the way the sound is actually said by the child and the phonological rules or processes that ‘map’ the two above.
Phonetic development is the gradual acquisition of the ability to articulate speech sounds (e.g. ‘p’, ‘b’, ‘t’, etc.) and structures (e.g. consonant clusters such as ‘fl’ and ‘skw’). It’s often referred to as articulation development.

Acquiring the sound system of language is an on-going and complex task in the first five years of life. It works at two different levels. First, they need to gain mastery over the nerves that control their vocal tract in order to produce their words accurately (phonetic ability). Second, children need to learn what sounds and combination of sounds are permissible in their language (phonological knowledge).

The course of phonetic ability
1. At birth, infants:
 - discriminate their native language from a foreign language
 - discriminate between two foreign languages
 - can count syllables and thus vowels in a word
 - perceive accent
2. At 1 month, infants discriminate between consonants
3. At 6-8 months, infants start to babble (vocally or manually)
4. At 8-10 months, infants:
 - vowels quality is influenced by the ambient language
 - sensitivity to foreign consonantal contracts starts to decline
5. At 10-12 months, infants:
 - cannot discriminate consonant contracts belonging to a foreign language
 - use a repertoire of consonants during babbling that is influence by their native language
 - produce their first words

Patterns in phonological development: at first, children tend to make simplifications that allow them to reduce the number of sounds and contrasts between sounds that they have to deal with. These simplification processes fall into three main types; substitution processes, assimilatory processes and syllable structure processes. Substitution processes involve substituting one sound segment with another which includes stopping (a fricative or affricative consonant is replaced by a stop consonant. The child will usually try to keep the place of articulation as similar to the target as possible, however, it’s easier for children to produce fricatives with stops), fronting (back consonants are replaced with ones that are articulated further forward in the mouth), gliding (liquid sounds ‘I’ or ‘r’ are replaced by glides ‘w’ or ‘j’) and vocalisation (a vowel replaces a syllable consonant).
Assimilatory processes where one sound segment are made more similar to or sometimes exactly the same as another one. Including consonant voicing (voiceless consonants followed by vowels, especially at the beginning of a word, will tend to become voiced like vowels), consonant de-voicing (consonants at the ends of words to become voiceless, assimilating to silence) and consonant harmony (a consonant will assimilate to another consonant in the word. More often, it is an early consonant that assimilates to a later one, although the reverse can also happen).
The syllable structure process is where the child adds or removes sounds or alters the structure of the syllable in some way. They reflect a preference by young children for CVCV (consonant vowel, consonant vowel) patterns. This includes consonant cluster reduction (where two or more consonants occur in a cluster, the child will reduce this to a single consonant), vowel epenthesis (children sometimes break up consonant clusters by deleting one of the consonants, but by adding a vowel to separate them), deletion of final consonants, syllable deletion (this usually involves deletion of the unstressed syllable(s) in a word, but can occasionally involve the deletion of a stressed syllable), reduplication (in a multi-syllable word, the child will repeat a CV syllable, usually the initial syllable). These simplification processes are quite systematic and can be observes in children all over the world, regardless of the language they are acquiring.

Jakobson (1941/68) proposed that infants babble the sounds of all language, also that there is discontinuity between babbling and first words and that phonemes are acquired in a universal order.
Transitional probabilities for within-word phonemes or syllable sequences are necessarily higher than for sequences across word boundaries. Therefore, recurrent pairs of sounds or syllables are likely to form part of the same word. Adults can learn the transitional probabilities and therefore segment out the “words” of a nonsense language presented aurally with no prosodic information. Their performance improves with the addition of one prosodic cure, final syllable lengthening (Saffran, Newport and Aslin, 1996).


Phonological delay: when a child is continuing to simplify their speech (using phonological processes) beyond the typical ages of use. A child with a severe phonological delay may be simplifying his speech so much that they are only producing a few different sounds when they should be able to produce many sounds (which is when the “classes” of sounds can come in handy). Children with phonological delays tend to be quite hard to understand, especially to strangers as parents or caregivers often learn their child’s patterns and therefore can understand them better.
According to Speech-Language Pathologist Caroline Bowen, who has done research and written books on the subject, there are five possible causes for phonological delay based on the research to date:

Phonological development (or phonemic development) is the gradual development of an ‘organised’, adult-like system of sound contrasts. Phonological development is thought to have three aspects which include the way the sound is stored in the child’s mind, the way the way the sound is actually said by the child and the phonological rules or processes that ‘map’ the two above.
Phonetic development is the gradual acquisition of the ability to articulate speech sounds (e.g. ‘p’, ‘b’, ‘t’, etc.) and structures (e.g. consonant clusters such as ‘fl’ and ‘skw’). It’s often referred to as articulation development.
Acquiring the sound system of language is an on-going and complex task in the first five years of life. It works at two different levels. First, they need to gain mastery over the nerves that control their vocal tract in order to produce their words accurately (phonetic ability). Second, children need to learn what sounds and combination of sounds are permissible in their language (phonological knowledge).
The course of phonetic ability
1. At birth, infants:
 - discriminate their native language from a foreign language
 - discriminate between two foreign languages
 - can count syllables and thus vowels in a word
 - perceive accent
2. At 1 month, infants discriminate between consonants
3. At 6-8 months, infants start to babble (vocally or manually)
4. At 8-10 months, infants:
 - vowels quality is influenced by the ambient language
 - sensitivity to foreign consonantal contracts starts to decline
5. At 10-12 months, infants:
 - cannot discriminate consonant contracts belonging to a foreign language
 - use a repertoire of consonants during babbling that is influence by their native language
 - produce their first words
Patterns in phonological development: at first, children tend to make simplifications that allow them to reduce the number of sounds and contrasts between sounds that they have to deal with. These simplification processes fall into three main types; substitution processes, assimilatory processes and syllable structure processes. Substitution processes involve substituting one sound segment with another which includes stopping (a fricative or affricative consonant is replaced by a stop consonant. The child will usually try to keep the place of articulation as similar to the target as possible, however, it’s easier for children to produce fricatives with stops), fronting (back consonants are replaced with ones that are articulated further forward in the mouth), gliding (liquid sounds ‘I’ or ‘r’ are replaced by glides ‘w’ or ‘j’) and vocalisation (a vowel replaces a syllable consonant).
Assimilatory processes where one sound segment are made more similar to or sometimes exactly the same as another one. Including consonant voicing (voiceless consonants followed by vowels, especially at the beginning of a word, will tend to become voiced like vowels), consonant de-voicing (consonants at the ends of words to become voiceless, assimilating to silence) and consonant harmony (a consonant will assimilate to another consonant in the word. More often, it is an early consonant that assimilates to a later one, although the reverse can also happen).
The syllable structure process is where the child adds or removes sounds or alters the structure of the syllable in some way. They reflect a preference by young children for CVCV (consonant vowel, consonant vowel) patterns. This includes consonant cluster reduction (where two or more consonants occur in a cluster, the child will reduce this to a single consonant), vowel epenthesis (children sometimes break up consonant clusters by deleting one of the consonants, but by adding a vowel to separate them), deletion of final consonants, syllable deletion (this usually involves deletion of the unstressed syllable(s) in a word, but can occasionally involve the deletion of a stressed syllable), reduplication (in a multi-syllable word, the child will repeat a CV syllable, usually the initial syllable). These simplification processes are quite systematic and can be observes in children all over the world, regardless of the language they are acquiring.
Jakobson (1941/68) proposed that infants babble the sounds of all language, also that there is discontinuity between babbling and first words and that phonemes are acquired in a universal order.
Transitional probabilities for within-word phonemes or syllable sequences are necessarily higher than for sequences across word boundaries. Therefore, recurrent pairs of sounds or syllables are likely to form part of the same word. Adults can learn the transitional probabilities and therefore segment out the “words” of a nonsense language presented aurally with no prosodic information. Their performance improves with the addition of one prosodic cure, final syllable lengthening (Saffran, Newport and Aslin, 1996).

Phonological delay: when a child is continuing to simplify their speech (using phonological processes) beyond the typical ages of use. A child with a severe phonological delay may be simplifying his speech so much that they are only producing a few different sounds when they should be able to produce many sounds (which is when the “classes” of sounds can come in handy). Children with phonological delays tend to be quite hard to understand, especially to strangers as parents or caregivers often learn their child’s patterns and therefore can understand them better.
According to Speech-Language Pathologist Caroline Bowen, who has done research and written books on the subject, there are five possible causes for phonological delay based on the research to date:
1. The child find the sound patterns of language totally confusing and cannot make out sound details from the overall pattern of sounds in language
2. The child's speech maturation may be severely delayed
3. The restricted speech system become "habit", suppressing further speech maturation
4. The child has poor perception and awareness of how speech sounds, and the difficulty other people have understanding them when they talk
5. The child has a specific difficulty initiating changes in their sound system, and knowing how to organise their sound in a consistent way


Table showing phonological development: 
http://www.srsdeaf.org/Downloads/SpeechLanguage_Development_Chart.pdf


Friday, 10 October 2014

Zach's Transcript

Zach's Language Transcript:

“I cutting around the edge” – omission
“don’t want to eat skins” – missing determiners
“we had some banana didn't we” and “you did just have some biscuits didn't you” – tag questions. Used to encourage him to answer the question even though she already knows the answer
“I think I don’t” – said in the wrong tense. Imitating what he hears other people saying
“I think you don’t” – repeating what he has already said for positive reinforcement
“frough” – this mispronunciation may be a result of trying to imitate what he has heard others saying as they have pronounces the 'th' as an 'f'
“what’s the lasagne” – over extension by category
“dose” – fis phenomenon. Instead of pronouncing the word correctly, Zach has said the word wrong as it’s easier for him to pronounce those sounds, so instead of ‘those’, he has said ‘dose’
“star” – by giving him praise, it encourages him to continue with what he had done or said correctly
“you did just have some biscuits didn't you? (1) what happened?” – closed/open questions allows him to answer the question in a more descriptive way


Monday, 22 September 2014

Coursework Ideas

My first idea is to look at various women's magazines with different price brackets. I would look at the more expensive magazines, such as Vogue and Elle, as well as cheaper ones such as Look and Take A Break. I would be comparing the advice columns in the magazines, looking at possible gender stereotypes and how/if they refer to men. The language may vary in the different price brackets.

My second idea would be to look at an archive of the social networks. This includes more outdated networking sites as well as what it used more currently, for example, Bebo, Facebook, Myspace, Twitter and Tinder. I would investigate whether or not people communicate differently over the various social networking sites. Also, I could perhaps look at how communication has differed over time on these websites. The same person may be needed in order to carry out the investigation.

Monday, 16 June 2014

Transcript Analysis

Looking at both of the transcripts, I noticed that they both show instrumental power. The first transcript from The Apprentice, shows how Sir Alan Sugar holds the power in the situation due to him being in charge and is the one who is employing the candidates, therefore being of a higher power status causing power asymmetry. You can see from the transcripts that one of the candidates (Phillip) is trying to gain power over Alan Sugar by attempting to interrupt him while he is speaking. Phillip interrupts Alan Sugar and tries to gain power with ‘no it was a touch task’ which is then interrupted by Alan Sugar again with ‘no you didn’t make any money’. This shows that Phillip’s attempt to gain power from Alan Sugar is unsuccessful as Alan Sugar regains all of the power straight away.

In the second transcript, which is from the TV show Educating Essex, it is similar as it also shows instrumental power. This is because the conversation is mainly between a teacher and a student. It shows that the teacher holds all of the power, however, the student continuously attempts to gain power from the teacher throughout their conversation. This could be due to the student wanting to perhaps seem humorous to the rest of the students in the class. This is shown through the student interrupting the teacher, for example she interrupts the teacher by saying ‘I don’t really pay attention to that’ and also saying things to the teacher such as ‘I’m bored of it’. This shows how the students wants the power, but due to the fact that the teacher has a higher authority, she is unsuccessful with her attempt as the teacher usually overlaps and interrupts what she is saying. The teacher keeps the power throughout the conversation between him and the student which is shown by using imperative sentences, for example ‘you are gonna do some practice questions’, and also declarative sentences, for example ‘you’re here to do work’ and ‘you’re here to do maths’.

Transcript 2: Educating Essex

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PKa4g3YkQmU

Teacher: T
Student: S
Class: C
Micropause: (.)
Pauses: (1), (2), etc
Rising or falling intonation: ↑ ↓

Interruptions and overlaps: /

T: my (2) problem (2) with some people in the class (2) is that don’t seem to remember stuff↑ (3) so you need to remember the area of a circle formula (.) you need to remember the circumference of a circle formula↓ (1) area of a circle is↑
C: pi squared
S: what is pi↑ (3) where did it come from↑ (2) sir↑/ who made up pi↑
T: /yeah↑/ I told you (.) last lesson where it came from
S: I don’t really pay attention/  to that
T: /I’ll explain to you at break (.) don’t worry (3) yeah↑(1) good↓(3) right you are gonna do some practice questions (.) on (.) area of a sector/  please remember
S: /Fun fun fu::::n
T: I’ll wait Carrie yeah↑(3) it’s not funny
S: James James James James James (.) I’m bored of it↓
T: Carrie (2) you’re here to work (.) you’re here to do maths (.) yeah
S: I’m just really hyper
T: I don’t care (.) can you do some work↑
S: I/  am
T: /it’s taken you nearly five minutes to open a book come on

Transcript 1: The Apprentice

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkcPahgnChM

Phillip: P
Alan Sugar: A
Woman: W
Loraine: L
Micropause: (.)
Pauses: (1), (2), etc
Rising or falling intonation: ↑ ↓

Interruptions and overlaps: /

P: I am arrogant, I am a big head and like I said last week it needs slapping out of us and I think that’s why I’m improving incredibly (1) I was responsive to Loraine and effectively we lost the task (2) I was project manager of the last task (.) and no one was bitching about me at the end of the day↓ and we won
A: if I remember rightly (.) that last task a fools win wasn’t it↑(1) didn’t the other team just bomb out badly/ 
W: /yes
A: /you didn't make/  any money
P: /that was a tough (.) no it was a tough task/  Sir Alan
A: /no you didn't make any money
P: but we won
A: you won by default (1) you lost money and you won by default
P: yeah I can’t do any right [shaking head]
A: Listen (.) don’t get impatient with me (.) Phillip (.)/ you know 
P: /I’m not Sir Alan it’s just you know you can’t (.) I can’t seem to say anything right (.) you criticize Loraine I get it in the nick (1) I win as project manager I get it in the nick (1) I can’t do anything right↑
A: that’s all you’ve done today Phillip (.) is criticize Loraine (1) if you could come out with something else constructive (1) um (.) I might listen to you (1) that’s all you’ve done from the minute you walked in this door today↑ 
P: because she’s trouble↑ sir Alan↓ she’s trouble (2) week after week after week you’ll get this again↓ and again↓ and again↓/  my perfor…  I think I’ve been one of the outstanding candidates over these past few weeks// I’ve had
L: /trouble↑
A: //woah listen (1) l (.) look (.) look (2) you know the body rocker/  thing (1) I don’t know the bleeding things gone to your head or what↓ okay you’ve done well there (.) yeah and the design of it (.) okay (.) but that’s it↑ you know (1) one swallow don’t make a summer (2) you understand (.) cause then you haven’t done that great↑
P: /yeah

Group Task - Twitter Feed Text

The text that we looked at was from a Twitter feed. We discussed that the text could have shown both influential power and instrumental power. Influential power is shown as the person who’s Twitter feed it is has the power unfollow, block or report whoever they want if they do not agree with what someone has tweeted. The use of instrumental power is shown as Marcus Brigstocke is a famous comedian and actor, therefore they could be following him due to his popularity and famous status. This also means that the celebrity has the power to only let what they want their fans/followers to see over the social network.


We also discussed how Twitter users can be very opinionated when expressing their thoughts and feelings in a tweet. This can be seen as face threatening acts which is why we also spoke about how a lot of celebrities write that it is normally their own opinion.